Which of the following is a common strategy for conflict resolution in organizations?

The option stating mediation as a common strategy for conflict resolution in organizations focuses on the role of a neutral third party who facilitates communication between disputing parties. Mediation helps parties reach a mutually acceptable agreement and encourages collaboration, making it a widely embraced strategy in various organizational settings. Mediation is particularly effective because it allows individuals to express their views and interests, fostering a more harmonious work environment.

While negotiation and arbitration are also effective methods for resolving conflicts, mediation stands out for its emphasis on dialogue and voluntary agreement rather than imposed decisions. In a negotiation, parties directly engage to reach an agreement, which can sometimes lead to a power imbalance if one side has more leverage. In arbitration, a third party makes a binding decision, which may not allow for the same collaborative spirit found in mediation.

Thus, while mediation is indeed a strong method for resolving conflicts, comprehensive approaches often involve a combination of strategies, including negotiation and arbitration, which would justify "all of the above" as a strong contender for the answer, as it acknowledges the effectiveness of each strategy in different contexts.